2. With the 0-100 scoring, with the above issue removed, the problem is the subjectivity, ESPECIALLY when you have as many votes as you want. This is part of the reason I suggested giving each standing party X votes and letting them carry forward to the next round. People liked that conceptually but they were worried about how it might complicate things which is fair. So let's be more conservative and take one step forward instead of two. We create a formula where each Standing Party gets X votes just for that grant round. For example, let's say there are 10 grants. Each Standing Party would get 40 points for each grant they have a right to vote in. So if I had no conflicts of interest, Factomize would get 400 points to award. We don't have to award them all, but they don't carry forward.
E.g. De Facto has 40 points, how many votes should be placed for Guide Pay? 3? 5? 10?
In strong grant round good projects may receive many more votes, so pre-approved grant like Guide Pay or something else won't get into awarded list.