I want to make it clear.
De Facto developed blog free of charge, we completely internalize all development & server setup costs.
131 FCT was paid for 1 year of hosting + backups @ Digital Ocean + Wordpress paid template (we initially decided to use Wordpress, but after we almost launch it, I...
Admin API calls implemented
GET /queue — Get all unprocessed writing tasks & tasks processed within last 1 hour
DELETE /queue — Manual delete task from queue
GET /users — Get all API users
POST /users — Create new API users
DELETE /users — Delete API user
PUT /users/:id — Update API...
I would support reducing efficiency if you provide any timelines.
Without timelines and details of work your lowering looks definitely odd.
I think you should provide reasonable timelines (as @CryptoLogic mentioned above) and tell us what we should expect to receive from your work till this...
Do I understand correctly that there is no visible results for Tom's work in this month, that can be shared to community, and you suggest not to vote for the prolongation of this grant?
If so, I am disappointed, but not surprised.
We are proud to report our contributions to the Factom Protocol in Q2 2019.
Full report available here:
First version of Factom Open API released
Fct.tools (Factom Testnet Monitoring) upgraded to v2
Yeah, that is how it works.
My question is about different.
1. You committed to report core dev works in this quarter on monthly basis
2. Putting the work, made in April, into this report, looks like a joke
3. You are telling me now to wait till end of quarter to see the results. But at the...
Grant completion: 35%
Refactored Open API config
Implemented API server restart
Implemented UI skeleton with webpack & assets mapper
Designed UI using React
Implemented Admin API calls group with separate admin authorization
Explored different authorization methods &...
You also mentioned a PR of status payload into this grant update thread – but that obviously was coded in the previous quarter and funded by previous grant, not this.
I would also raise my concerns regarding Tom's efficiency and for the transparency give my feedback about implementing status...
@LayerTech In the branch above I see a lot of commits by Inc and Who, but no one from LayerTech.
Can you clarify it? Does Tom really work fulltime on Factom?
Full 4 months passed since you work on Factom core...